MantisBT - MEGA | |||||
View Issue Details | |||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
0006787 | MEGA | [All Projects] Feedback | public | 2025-05-09 13:44 | 2025-05-09 13:44 |
Reporter | guest | ||||
Assigned To | |||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||
Product Version | MEGA 12 | ||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||
First Name | Holger | ||||
Last Name | Herlyn | ||||
herlyn@uni-mainz.de | |||||
Confirm Email | herlyn@uni-mainz.de | ||||
Summary | 0006787: AICc inferecnce in model testing | ||||
Description | Dear colleagues, In model testing I tried to re-caculate the AICc values presented by MEGA 12. For doing so, I fed k and lnL accordiing to the output table into the standard formula: AICc = AIC + (2k(k + 1)) / (n - k - 1), where AIC = 2k - 2lnL and n = number of nucleotide positions of the alignment. The resulting AICc values differ from the ones reported by MEGA 12. Is this perhaps because MEGA uses a different formula for AICc and/or AIC inferencce and, if so which? THANK YOU!!! Cheers, Holger | ||||
Steps To Reproduce | |||||
Additional Information | |||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Relationships | |||||
Attached Files | |||||
Issue History | |||||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change | ||
2025-05-09 13:44 | guest | New Issue |
There are no notes attached to this issue. |